LaFayette council candidates weigh in on upcoming liquor vote
by Matt Ledger
Oct 19, 2009 | 2602 views | 8 8 comments | 20 20 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Waitress Lara St. Claire pours a tall frosty one for a customer at the Village Bar and Grill in Rock Spring while patrons watch college football. “It’s a popular place because there isn’t another one like it around here,” St. Claire said. (Messenger photo/Matt Ledger)
Waitress Lara St. Claire pours a tall frosty one for a customer at the Village Bar and Grill in Rock Spring while patrons watch college football. “It’s a popular place because there isn’t another one like it around here,” St. Claire said. (Messenger photo/Matt Ledger)
slideshow
While some LaFayette restaurant owners hope for, and some sermons preach against, the passage of the distilled spirits referendum on Nov. 3, the candidates on the ballot seem relieved that the fate of the decision is in the hands of the people.

“We want the people to have a voice since it has been an issue before,” mayor Neal Florence said.

“This issue is far too big for just five people to decide,” said council member Andy Arnold, who believes that the people, and not the council, should make the final decision on liquor in LaFayette. His challenger, Beacher Garmany, echoes the sentiment, saying he is “in favor of letting the citizens decide, instead of the city council.”

LaFayette already contends with the ramifications of alcohol sales.

The LaFayette Golf Course recently adopted selling beer to golfers, while the private membership of the Elks Lodge have enjoyed a full bar just outside city limits for many years.

“We already have it in the county — why not the city?” asked Keith Talley, who is running for the Ward 2 council seat.

“If a business is to keep its doors open, it must be given certain incentives to do so. Without our business dollars and support, no one can survive,” said municipal judge candidate Ken Maples. “Before you travel to Fort Oglethorpe or Dalton, shop our local businesses first. Chances are you'll find the same things here at home and save a pocket full of gas money as well.”

An influx of chain restaurants arrived quickly four years ago when Fort Oglethorpe passed a similar measure, bringing in establishments that average 5-10% alcohol sales, but achieve tens of thousands of dollars in business weekly, according to one of the restaurant managers.

LaFayette residents who frequent restaurants that serve alcohol must go outside of the city and even the county, frequently to Battlefield Parkway, which has a handful of restaurants that do.

“ If someone wants to drink, they go to Dalton or Chattanooga, then drive back to LaFayette all boozed up,” said municipal judge Barry Hollis. “If people think that drinking and driving is not going on in this town now, they are kidding themselves.”

Hollis does not expect an increase in DUIs if the measure passes, but does question whether “kids on the golf course [are] going to take it up,” referring to the mixture of high-school-age players and adults who regularly use the course.

The Nov. 3 vote will not change the golf course’s ability to serve beer, despite mayoral challenger James Mashburn’s contention that “it should be taken out of the clubhouse,” in the event the people were to vote no on the issue.

Mashburn says he is vehemently against the sale of alcohol, “always have [been] and always will be.”

However, in the event the referendum passes, Mashburn thinks “permits ought to be low enough for all businesses to be able to afford it,” allowing an even playing field for local businesses.

From an economic standpoint, the candidates differ on what potential revenue the sale of spirits could bring.

Florence said, “There would not be much to gain. With only a $10,000 to $12,000 increase, it’s not enough.”

Council member Norm Hodge agrees. “In discussions that I have had with city leaders from Ft. Oglethorpe, Ringgold and Summerville, alcohol by the drink has not had as much of an economic impact as you might think. I don't believe it will pass here in LaFayette,” Hodge said.

“It would help the city. It would help it tremendously, I believe,” Talley countered. “That’s what this town needs. LaFayette needs more growth.”

Even those opposed to alcohol in the city admit to taking their dollars to Battlefield Parkway for dinner.

“I have eaten at those restaurants,” Mashburn admitted.

Wendell Bruce is one of two local restaurant owners who have embraced the concept of brews with burgers, saying imbibing increases the bottom line.

Bruce and his wife operate the Village Sports Bar and Grill in Fieldstone Farms on U.S. 27 in Rock Spring. “I saw a need for it since everyone rides to Chattanooga,” said Bruce, who added that he has seen “great support from the local people. Everyone understands we are not one of those Rossville Boulevard type bars.”

With “nothing comparable in the area,” Bruce says the restaurant draws a capacity crowd on Friday nights, when live music is played.

Village Sports Bar and Grill has been open for several months and averages 18-20% of gross sales even though they only serve beer and wine.
Comments
(8)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
SlowProgress
|
October 27, 2009
Friends, just because restaurants may serve alcohol does not mean our city is going downhill!-Instead it is considered PROGRESS!!Hey lets all wake up and pass this next week. Our hard earned $ is going to our neighboring towns. Cant you folks see this??? Lets all get our heads out of the sand and wake up. No wonder we are going "down the tubes" like the other poster said!!! After all, this is not "Little House on the Prairie" !!! By the way, its 2009!!
cwallin
|
October 24, 2009
Last year every one made a big deal when Bi-Loin LaFayette started selling beer in the store.People turned in their bonus cards and the news coverage brought so much attention to all the people protesting and praying in front of the store.Wall-Mart up the road didn't announce they were going to start selling it and just put it on the the shelves and no protesters or preaching and the store is still doing fine.Selling drinks in restaurants will not make people drink any more and it won't destroy the town. The people who drink and drive and who want to get drunk always will, you can't stop it.Alcohol is sold all over.Who are you kidding.
VWN
|
October 24, 2009
trj522 wrote on Friday, Oct 23 at 09:29 PM »

"There is no difference between having a beer at home and having one at an eating establishment, they are both wrong. I would like to recommend we out law all sales of liquor, I like the word prohibition. I know that will not stop people from drinking, but at least it's not condoning it. Some of our councilmen would leaglize prostitution if they could tax it. And the sad thing is, in alot of the churches in this town, sitting on the pews are the some of the very same ones who the night before sat on the bar stool or at home in their lazyboy with a Budlight in their hand. GOD HELP US!"

Excuse me, but the attitude you demonstrate is exactly what is wrong with the City of LaFayette right now. Outlaw liquor? Great! While we're at it, let's outlaw cigarettes! They're killing us also. Let's outlaw soft drinks! They're making out children fat! Also, there's probably a cancer-causing agent in the shampoo you're using. If it were up to you and people like you, we would all be walking around sober, suffering nicotine withdrawel, dragging our fat kids around by their dirty hair. You, my friend, are not the only voice in LaFayette. Like it or not, LaFayette is on the way down the tubes. Count the number of businesses that have closed. The sale and consumption of alcohol within the city limits is not the problem. Outdated attitudes are the problem.

It goes a little something like this. A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo, much like the brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. The slowest buffalo are the sick and weak so they die off first, making it possible for the herd to move at a faster pace. Like the buffalo the weak, slow brain cells are the ones that are killed off by beer drinking, making the brain operate faster. The moral of the story, drink more beer, it will make you smarter.
SamElliot
|
October 23, 2009
Just because you drink at a food establishment doesn't mean you'll leave the place drunk. If you're going there to eat, does that mean you'll leave fat? I agree with VWN. Oh and prohibition???? Are you kidding me?! If you're so concerned about drunk driving sots then how bout a good reputable taxi service being started up thus bringing in another job opportunity for people in our struggling city.
trj522
|
October 23, 2009
There is no difference between having a beer at home and having one at an eating establishment, they are both wrong. I would like to recommend we out law all sales of liquor, I like the word prohibition. I know that will not stop people from drinking, but at least it's not condoning it. Some of our councilmen would leaglize prostitution if they could tax it. And the sad thing is, in alot of the churches in this town, sitting on the pews are the some of the very same ones who the night before sat on the bar stool or at home in their lazyboy with a Budlight in their hand. GOD HELP US!
VWN
|
October 23, 2009
What is wrong with this city? There is NOTHING wrong with having a drink with your meal at a restaurant. To do so doesn't make you a bad person, or an "sot", or an alcoholic. What's the difference between having a beer at home, bought inside the city limits, and having a beer at an eating establishment? I know, I know. "Because you're at home!" Nine times out of ten, you've killed a couple of beers before you pull in the driveway.

"Let the Bible thumpers have one place in earth where they can take thier kids and not have to see a bunch of sots sitting on a bar stool."

You DO have such a place. It's called a church.

VWN

TimJones
|
October 23, 2009
Keep it out, selling beer is not going to cause LaFayette to grow. Good night, we can't even keep a Burger King in this town what makes everyone think Applebees is coming here just because a Mexican resturant can serve beer to bunch of drunks. What's wrong with just having a small town where a person can live and raise his family? If someone wants the big city life with all it's sinnful pleasures MOVE. Let the Bible thumpers have one place in earth where they can take thier kids and not have to see a bunch of sots sitting on a bar stool.
VWN
|
October 23, 2009
Talley states, "LaFayette needs more growth...". How long did it take for someone to come up with that one? ANY growth would be good for LaFayette. It doesn't take a mental giant to make the observation LaFayette is nothing short of a ghost town. There's got to be a reason for that.

Leaving the vote to the people is the onlh chance LaFayette has. When judge Hollis stated, "If someone wants to drink, they go to Dalton or Chattanooga, then drive back to LaFayette all boozed up,” he's merely wanting to be re-elected in a city belonging to the Bible belt. Just because someone wants a drink with their meal doesn't mean they're going to be "all boozed up" at the end of the meal.

Go ahead, let the extra revenue pass you by. Give it to cities that deserve it, like Fort Oglethorpe, Dalton, and Chattanooga. It's called PROGRESS; something the LaFayette City Council obviously wants no part of.

VWN
Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.