Editorial: Hutcheson on road to recovery, needs your support
Feb 03, 2013 | 1887 views | 13 13 comments | 9 9 recommendations | email to a friend | print
Hutcheson Medical Center, under the guidance of president and CEO Roger Forgey for a year now, is finally on the road to financial health. We think it’s time for the community to get behind Hutcheson.

In December the Fort Oglethorpe hospital posted a profit of nearly $150,000. That doesn’t sound like much. But consider the picture a year ago, in December 2011, when Hutcheson operated nearly $1 million in the red for the month.

The hospital has borrowed $20 million from Erlanger Health System, which took over management of the Hutcheson in May 2011. That money was used to help pay down some of Hutcheson’s debt and for basic expenses, such as paying employees.

Now the hospital wants a $25 million bond anticipation note, with a low 1-percent interest rate, to quickly pay off a $12 million Medicare debt that carries an 11-percent interest rate. That plan simply makes good business sense.

The rest of the money will be used to pay of part of the hospital’s debt to medical suppliers and to upgrade equipment at the hospital.

As for exactly how the Medicare debt accrued, that ship has sail and is well out to sea. The hospital has turned its attention to the more pressing business at hand — paying off high-interest debt as quickly as possible.

We understand those who want to stop the borrowing, who want to stop investing into what some have termed a “sinkhole” and “money pit,” and to simply let the hospital go on the auction block. They argue that we, the counties of Walker, Catoosa, and Dade, who own the hospital’s property and who have leveraged that property so Hutcheson can borrow money, will be left holding the bag. They also point out that Hutcheson has hitched itself to Erlanger, a hospital with its own set of serious financial problems. And it’s likely, they further point out, that the hospital will have to borrow even more money to pull itself out of debt. These are indeed arguments with lots of merit.

But now isn’t the time to give up, not in light of the hospital’s new bill of profit-making health.

Hospital officials predicted they would begin operating in the black within less than two years after coming under Erlanger’s aegis. They have delivered on that promise. Now it’s time for the community to deliver its full support.

Comments
(13)
Comments-icon Post a Comment
north_ga_mama
|
February 06, 2013
Thank you for posting a positive editorial about Hutcheson. I am an employee there and I can tell you that there has been a tremendous turnaround in the past year. The management that ran the hospital into the ground is no longer there and the fact that the hospital can report a positive profit as compared to last year's $1 million loss proves that the hospital can be successful and that the residents of north Georgia will support it.
gagirl318
|
February 06, 2013
the_dark_side - Really? Does that mean there is no bright side for you? I take offense to your comment about the more talented, marketable employees being long gone. I have been with HMC for more than 20 years and would put my resume up against yours any day. I have had opportunities to go elsewhere, closer to home and for more money, but chose to stay because I believe Hutcheson is going to succeed. We have been through many bad administrations but none has tried harder than the current one. We are a family and treat our coworkers, patients and visitors with love and respect. Shame on you for your ignorant comments. How progressive would the counties have been without our local hospital?
the_dark_side
|
February 03, 2013
The facilities are dilapidated and the more talented,marketable employees are long gone.Hutcheson owes its soul to too many creditors to properly serve the citizens of Walker,Dade,and Catoosa Counties.They have been an embarassment and burden to these progressive counties long enough !!!
snarky
|
February 03, 2013
I think that throwing good money after bad is anything BUT good business,however...

If we have to pour more money into this place,I think that it would be stupid to lend it to these people at 1 percent. With the risk that they present,they could never get that kind of favorable interest rate in the open market.They will never run that place with any degree of efficiency if we hand them what is essentially "free" money. (And a 1% interest rate is as close to free as you can get). We should at least get the same juice that they pay Regions Bank or any of their trade creditors. Otherwise, it's a subsidy that screws the taxpayer.

And what rate is truly fair? I would say a minimum of 5 1/4 %. Then the taxpayers could be paid back for backstopping these people when the going got tough.Otherwise, I say let them padlock the thing or sell it to a for-profit chain and have it PAY taxes instead of consume them.
Bernard22
|
February 03, 2013
Sounds like Snarky has a plan to me! The best part of the plan is Snarky's last sentence.

wgaca
|
February 06, 2013
Snarky You're writing style looks very familiar. It's easy to be mouthy and brave when you're too much of a coward to use your name. I'm guessing short man's complex. Probably > 5' 5"

There are over 850 dedicated employees at Hutcheson. Your constant criticism of them reveals your flaws not theirs
snarky
|
February 06, 2013
"There are over 850 dedicated employees at Hutcheson. Your constant criticism of them reveals your flaws not theirs"

Write this down and keep it in your pocket (and refer to it when you forget):

HMC IS NOT A JOBS PROGRAM! I don't give a toss how many people work over there. The taxpayers are gonna get screwed here and I'm saying what needs to be said.Too bad you're more worried about my physical traits (or lack thereof) to see that the real problem is that the regimes that get hired over there look at HMC as a place to come in,feather their own nest and then decamp for another job before the place goes boom.

And how can we believe the numbers that are being put out there now about a magical profit being earned-Just in time to beg a $25 million dollar wet kiss from our county government ? It's a miracle,I tell ya! I'm not buying it.

And what do you have against them being made to pay a reasonable rate of interest on money that we go out and borrow because they can't? Not one dollar of this bond will help one patient in there now. It will go to mop up the mess that the incompetent idiots that ran the place into the ground have made.I'm sick of this kind of foolishness and you should be too.

north_ga_mama
|
February 06, 2013
The reason Hutcheson shouldn't have to go to the open market is because they are quasi governmental, which means they qualify for a bond rating. However, you need to realize that Hutcheson doesn't collect taxes from north GA residents like other public hospitals do, yet they provide millions of dollars in medical care to the community each year.
geno36
|
February 06, 2013
Is it just me or does snarky sound a lot like Ex-councilman Egeland? Ranting like a loon.
snarky
|
February 06, 2013
"Ranting like a loon. "

No, actually,I'm not one of those jellyfish politicians that you people think you can push around to keep that place open and feeding off the sugary teat of this county. I'm not intimidated by your name calling (I've been called worse by better than you people). I'll tell it like it is and tough for you,I guess.

If HMC can make it without handouts and subsidies,more power to them. But they need to pay their own way and stop throwing money into a blast furnace just so the "850 caring professionals" over there have a job.
wgaca
|
February 07, 2013
"Jobs program"? 90% of the 850 employees could have another job within 2 weeks But I guess that's hard to see from your location. Most of these people are at Hutcheson because they love Hutcheson, not because they have no other choices. They have plenty of choices
WalkerWatcher
|
February 07, 2013
The fact that you say "I don't give a toss about how many people work over there" speaks volumes. what would hurt the county more a 1% loan or 850 unemployed taxpayers. I keep reading about prior management and how they ran the facility into the ground. How long does the current administration have to pay for "sins of the past" and just what do they have to do prove they are turning the situation around? If published and, I assume, audited numbers are not significant evidence of progress, what would be? I figure there is some sort of "axe to grind" but attacking the argument and not the issue is unproductive and certainly does not benefit the community.
JVTuttle
|
February 07, 2013
Snarky, again you seem to have an axe to grind. So you would like to have Hutcheson sold to a for-profit hospital chain? From every article I read, not one penny of tax payer money has been given to that hospital in years, despite the fact that Hutcheson provides millions in indigent care each year. By the way, a for-profit hospital would hold each of counties accountable for making up the cost of indigent care. That means tax payer money going to pay for the indigent care - something that is not occuring now.

I am a Catoosa voter, and I support our county hospital.

Snarky, your bitterness defeats you.

Postings are not edited and are the responsibility of the author. You agree not to post comments that are abusive, threatening or obscene. Postings may be removed at our discretion.